Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UEFA Champions League 2012: Chelsea Wins on Penalties

Hawks Vs. Sixers Final Score: Atlanta's Win Streak Snapped In Philadelphia 90-76

Star-divide

The Atlanta Hawks saw their four-game winning streak snapped Friday night at the hands of the Philadelphia 76ers 90-76. Atlanta built a 47-39 lead at halftime before falling into some old habits in the second half to help ignite a Sixers charge.

The Hawks got downright defensive in the first half thanks in part to some stingy defense by Jeff Teague on Philadelphia point guard Jrue Holiday and the Sixers inability to take or make good shots. Philly came into the game as the No. 3 scoring team in the league and Atlanta held them to just 39 points in the first half on 34 percent shooting.

Philadelphia flipped the script in the second half outscoring the Hawks 25-10 in the third quarter and cruising home to victory. Atlanta scored just 29 points in the second half as Philly tightened the defensive screws. The Hawks didn't help matters by failing to find any offensive rhythm going to the basket and ended up settling for long contested jump shots. That would have been ok had those shots gone in but they missed and it led to many run out opportunities for an athletic Sixers club. Jodie Meeks hit three of four three point attempts in the third quarter to help Philadelphia take control.

For the Hawks, Willie Green was just about the lone bright spot offensively when the smoke cleared finishing with 14 points on 6-7 shooting. Jeff Teague finished with 12 points, six assists and five steals but did most of his damage in the first half. Josh Smith and Tracy McGrady finished with 10 points.

Thaddeus Young led the Sixers with 20 points off the bench in just 22 minutes. Jrue Holiday added 16 points and 11 assists while Jodie Meeks hit four three-pointers for 12 points.

After the game, Larry Drew was not pleased with his team's performance in the second half. A unusually candid Drew had this to say post-game:

"It got tough for us in the third quarter and we quit. That's what happened."

More Drew

"I am hoping it's out of character," Drew said. "I saw a pattern with it last year and I thought we had turned the corner with it this year. Not the fact that we lost the game, but the fact that it got tough for us and we did not respond. You could see it in our faces and see it in our body language."

and finally

"Teams are going to make runs," Drew said. "It's how you respond to runs. You either man up or you fold the tent. Tonight we certainly folded the tent in that third quarter. What's disappointing is we talked about when a team makes a run, you play through it. You don't hang your heads and feel sorry for yourself, you don't start crying to officials. You have to respond by toughening up defensively, executing your stuff even harder. I've seen us do it before. Tonight we didn't do it."

That is a pretty stiff tongue lashing from a coach that doesn't usually adhere to such tactics. Drew appeared to be most upset with the Hawks defensive effort once things started going south in the third quarter. It will be interesting to see how the team responds on Saturday against the Cavs.

For more on the Atlanta Hawks check out SB Nation Atlanta, follow Jason Walker and Kris Willis, along with Peachtree Hoops on Twitter and check out the Peachtree Hoops Facebook Fan Page.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Big words by Drew.

Kind of refreshing to hear him say what everyone is thinking. Question is: how many times will it work before they tune him out?

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 21, 2012 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

Funny

Even when Drew is going off on his team, it’s still relatively tame. I’ve definitely heard worse tongue-lashings by a coach on a team for poor effort.

Braves will be fine. I'm not worried.

by Bronn on Sep 18, 2011 4:26 PM EDT

by Bronn on Jan 21, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

well LD

why didn’t you give Ivan the opportunity to make a difference in that game? Outrebounded almost by 20 and beat on the offensive glass 15 to 5….clearly we needed a different mix. Marvin and Josh are USELESS if they stay stationed on the perimeter and that never changed in the second half. Then LD pulls the starters with 3:29 down 12 or 14 almost channeling the chicago game where he pulled the starters with 1:15 to go down a few buckets.

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 21, 2012 10:01 AM EST reply actions  

LD was visibly pissed at his players.

With about 5 minutes left we made a poor play on defense after a stupid shot…LD stared at one of the guys on the floor, mumbled something to himself, and quietly sat down. Next dead ball, he removed everyone.

Who can blame him? The players were playing careless basketball and all effort vanished. I’d have been furious, too…and I kinda was.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 21, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with Duff

When he pulled the starters with 3:29 to go he was mad at the group on the floor.

More and more it is starting to look like its either Vlad or Ivan. Doesn’t look like we are going to get both. That is the penalty for playing Collins so many minutes

@Kris_Willis
+Kris Willis
facebook.com/krisawillis

by Kris Willis on Jan 21, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

in a game like that

we didnt need vlad

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 21, 2012 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Playing Collins a lot of minutes is a huge penalty.

19-20 minutes? Seems like WAY too long.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 21, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

He is trying to play two centers

and the reality is that Collins is just a specialist at this point and is only effective against certain centers in the league.

@Kris_Willis
+Kris Willis
facebook.com/krisawillis

by Kris Willis on Jan 21, 2012 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

kinda of late response no?

he should have did that in the middle of the third

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 21, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I noted during the third quarter that I thought they needed a timeout

I don’t remember the exact time but I think it was two trips before Meeks hit the three to put them up.

Don’t get me wrong the loss sucks but it only gets worse if they don’t win tonight.

@Kris_Willis
+Kris Willis
facebook.com/krisawillis

by Kris Willis on Jan 21, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

My Larry Drew problem

Here’s why I don’t believe in our coach. Larry Drew has been around this group for 6 years and he coaches as if he doesn’t know who he’s playing or their psyche. These should be HIS guys (not the new vets, but the rest should) and he should be in tune with what they can and can’t do, but routinely he does (I should be saving this for a TRUTH) things that highlight that he’s really out of touch and doesn’t have control of this team. My time with the Hawks knew that we needed a TO in 3 games this year to settle us and get back to winning b-ball. Now, I have seen Larry do that vs. the bad teams we’ve played, but in the biggest games when you need your coach to help you – he hasn’t recognized when this team is losing focus. It’s easy when you’re blowing Chicago out – it’s not when you are actually controlling a game vs. the same Chicago team and this Sixers team and then, it starts to fall apart.

A team that is in synch has his players back up his statement of quitting if that’s what happens. It’s not like we haven’t seen this team quit before. You can’t charge them with quitting without knowing that your leaders actually agree that they quit. I think he’ll regret that. I wish my boss would tell me that I sucked when I was actually trying. There’s a difference btw not doing well and not trying. If they quit, you obviously didn’t call a TO or pull anyone to resolve it. If your team quits you sit all of them down in the 3rd quarter. You didn’t realize that they were quitting until the 4th quarter with 3mins, LD?

I personally just thought the jumpers didn’t fall, Joe was completely off, and you were beat by the better team last night. I didn’t see quit unless you are talking about the things that fundamentally we do that can backfire (shooting lots of jumpers, not rebounding, playing Jason Collins after you got away with it to start the game). I said this after both games I’ve sat behind the bench this season and I haven’t seen anything to make me disagree – the team doesn’t really believe in Larry Drew (I KNOW Jeff and Zaza definitely don’t and for good reason) and that’s a problem that’s not going away. Winning is only masking that issue.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 10:27 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I think you hit the nail on the head.

The teams assistant coaches have more influence on the team than Larry Drew does. Teague brought that to my attention when he said.

“When I am sitting out there being casual I think that’s when I’m not ay my best and I think that hurts the team. ‘Quick’ [Nick Van Exel] always tells me in my ear to be aggressive, so that’s what I do.”

I thought that should be the coaches job right? Shouldn’t they be the ones encouraging players to become aggresive? I think Larry Drew is still in the same mindframe of an Assistant Coach and his methods haven’t really evolved from that state.

Ron Artest = Ron (sm)Artest - He Is The Most Interesting Man In The World

by JoshChildressAfroIsCure4Cancer on Jan 21, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes and no

an assistant does a lot of the middle man work between the team and the head coach.

Drew was often that buffer between the players and Mike Woodson. Its not an uncommon occurance

@Kris_Willis
+Kris Willis
facebook.com/krisawillis

by Kris Willis on Jan 21, 2012 4:03 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

yep

i agree – the asst coach deal is not the problem. Completely agree – asst coaches have a role to play. I’m not saying that the asst coaches are part of the problem here.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly I think it's a huge problem.

My point is that the assistant coach has a higher influence on a players productivity than the head coach. That in part is caused by LD’s inability to use Teague adequately in a game-time decision. I still don’t think he knows how to use a correct lineup and that is why he will always be stuck in “assistant coach mode” and never mold assert himself into a head coach. 15+ years as an assistant will do that to you.

Apparently, before he was hired he was known to be a really good coach for the Guard and Small Forward position especially point guard development. He coached the likes of Kobe Bryant, Baron Davis, Richard Jefferson, Rip Hamilton, Jason Kidd, and Gilbert Arenas and all attribute success to LD. However, this was all on a one-on-one basis. Unfortunately, The head coach position is not like that. I don’t think that he will ever attain as much influence and productivity as he did on as an assistant coach

Ron Artest = Ron (sm)Artest - He Is The Most Interesting Man In The World

by JoshChildressAfroIsCure4Cancer on Jan 22, 2012 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

He's been a head coach for how long?

You are expecting him to have account for that much success in a fraction of the time. Hawks have good assistants that are in with the players. Drew is the manager now and the head coach – player dynamic is different that the assistant-player dynamic on every team and not just the Hawks.

Heck Chuck Person basically got a job with the Lakers because of his relationship with Ron Artest.

@Kris_Willis
+Kris Willis
facebook.com/krisawillis

by Kris Willis on Jan 22, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh and...

last night was the penalty for the hot streak from Josh from the perimeter. The coaching staff and players need to continue to impress upon Josh that there’s this thing called (NERD ALERT) regression to the mean. Josh, your jumper is a below average jump shot and that option is the worst of all of your options (well, that and you leading the break). The fact that nobody is saying that and actively doing something to change the fact that that’s where he is on the court just means we’ll have to live with nights like this. You can’t get mad at Josh for it since it’s accepted by everyone in the Hawks organization. If it wasn’t, it would change. I can’t imagine someone said – Josh, we would rather lose with you inside than win with you outside and until you understand that – we’re never going to win anything of substance. You can get away with that vs. the Kings. You can’t get away with that in the playoffs, so we’re going to practice this now. It’s lazy and it’s going to work sometimes and give you false hope that you can actually can do it, but you can’t. Even when it works – it’s not working. Don’t be fooled and if you need a reminder – here’s a tape of it not working. Period.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 10:33 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Counted FIVE botched breaks last night.

Why does he not understand the importance of getting it to a guard and running the floor and filling a lane for a scoring opportunity? I will never understand this complete lack of basic basketball acumen.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 21, 2012 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

but that's

partly something that the coaches have to express. I need to hear that he is ignoring the coach’s desire on that. otherwise, it’s a coaching issue to me…

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

hmm
Coach Doug Collins wrote a halftime note for his team on the board: "If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together,"

from yahoo sports

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 21, 2012 11:04 AM EST reply actions  

It sounded like jeff was having a good game

did everyone just start to suck whenthe third quarter began?

Ivan Johnson does not buy ground beef, he just takes a whole cow, runs it through his beard, and fully cooked hamburgers come out.

by Throw on Jan 21, 2012 11:45 AM EST reply actions  

five steals in the first half

then the sixers stole the ball from us a few times. Then we didn’t rebound or take good percentage shots and it was over

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 21, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

ugh

its like the team from last year

Ivan Johnson does not buy ground beef, he just takes a whole cow, runs it through his beard, and fully cooked hamburgers come out.

by Throw on Jan 21, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

the only positive I can take from this game

is that i can finally wash my lucky shorts. On a serious response, I hope the team doesnt start to collapse after this game

Ivan Johnson does not buy ground beef, he just takes a whole cow, runs it through his beard, and fully cooked hamburgers come out.

by Throw on Jan 21, 2012 11:51 AM EST reply actions  

LD's statements are an over-reaction

This was not a make or break game for Hawks. Hawks were playing excellent ball in first half. Once Smoove jumpers failed to go in, and Marvin exacerbated everything with his weak play, thinks snowballed. I don’t think the team quit. Yes JJ did not have a good game, but I understand with Iguodala defending him.

Still a lot of positives to take from this game. Hawks were able to stay with Sixers, which are playing tremendous ball. Teague had a great first half, until he just got tired and upset at Marvin for lack of movement.

Lessons:
1. If the first two jumpers don’t go in, Smoove has to give it up.
2. Hawks still need a starting level center. Defense and rebounding were horrible last night at the center position.

The more important game is tonight. That is the one we can’t afford to lose.
No need topanic over one game against a very good team. We’ll see what happens when Sixers come back to A-town. Hopefully we would have added a starting center for Kirk by then.

by ATLpaul on Jan 21, 2012 12:45 PM EST reply actions  

uh

smoove never needs to shoot jumpers. Period. He needs to shoot them as a complete last resort – 4 seconds left on the clock type stuff. I keep saying to you – he can get shots on the floor that just aren’t jumpers. He just doesn’t and the coaches don’t tell him not to. That has nothing to do with a center.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Facts disagree with you

First of all, you have a tendency to talk in absolutes. So I need to always take that into consideration before answering you, because I think that is your style, more than your intent.

Now if you look at the facts:
1. Smoove hitting shots at 42.8% from 10-15 feet this year. This is the highest rating of his career. The next highest year at that range was last year at 31.1%.
2. Smoove hitting shots at 40% from 16-23 feet this year. This is the highest rating of his career. The next highest year at that range was last year at 39%.
3. His three percentage is very low, but he has taken so little it is not worth mentioning.

Clearly, if you take last year and this year into consideration, those percentages are nice numbers and not just a one time thing. Should he take as many shots as JJ from outside? No. Never. But to speak in absolutes, when other opponents play off him and give him a chance to take the shot from outside is ridiculous when he is making those shots at percentages I shared with you above. In fact he is making a higher percentage than JJ at 16-23 feet.

As I said in my post, Smoove must limit himself based on how the game goes. I am writing this comment after the Cavs game as an Fyi. But that game is a good way how he should play if the jumper is not going well. Take 2 or 3 and if he makes them, he needs to continue to take it, If he is not, play like the Cavs game.

You talk about he should NEVER take shots from outside. But you ignore the fact that he does not have the moves of Z-Bo or a Kevin McHale. He is an athletic PF. He scores because he has a good first step, he is great in transition, and he can use jumping ability to get rebounds. But those can be shut down by great defenses, and there are times he will be offered the jumper and he must make.

Funny how you used the opportunity where Smoove had a bad game to bring this up again, while he has been carrying the team on his back since Lion went down. And yes, trust me, I remember your comment about fool’s gold relative to his jumpers before, and you need to remember I disagreed with you back then also.

I respect your passion though as always

by ATLpaul on Jan 22, 2012 8:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Highest rating = still below league average shooting

You can bring up his highest rating and then, if you put it in context with league average shooting rates it is still not even AVERAGE for an NBA player at that range. So, if those were shots that were 3pters where you get a bonus for that shot, then we’d be talking about something, but we’re not, so you actually prove my point vs. take away from it. So, he should just never shoot a shot he can’t make at a league average rate when he is actually a league LEADER at shots taking at the rim. Most players know their range. He doesn’t realize that he doesn’t have that range. Can he make some? Sure. It’s like asking Collins to shoot jumpers. He can hit some, but do we want that shot? No. The Hawks will never be successful with him shooting that shot under any circumstance. You keep bringing up these things that don’t have anything to do with shooting jump shots. Being Z-Bo or Kevin McHale have ZERO to do with jump shooting if you can’t do it. So, I don’t want any player shooting shots they can’t make just because it’s given to them. They will give Zaza a bunch of jump shots too but he has the good sense not to shoot them. If you are stopped by a great defense, then you just get stopped and you make a pass or rebound to help the team – it doesn’t mean go out and shoot shots that a ‘great defense’ wants you to take. So, no – he doesn’t have to do that. And your insistence that he must is just never going to bear itself out.

As a note, he single handedly beat the Bulls in the playoffs, a great defense to be sure and he was not shooting jumpers. So, he doesn’t have to take jump shots b/c even if he makes them – a team is going to let him have them and why would a team do that…well, it’s because they know about the concept of regression to the mean. I’d rather he put all that time into making FTs. And I do mean all…

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 22, 2012 10:59 AM EST up reply actions  

It is a little difficult to follow your last post

You are comparing him to whom exactly??? when you say he is below league average? Can you be more specific as opposed to generalizations? It is easy to talk generally based on observations during the game, and make statements that a 5 year old can make, which is Smoove should not take jump shots period.

I gave you Z-Bo and McHale as examples of players that have tremendous inside moves. If a player does not have those moves, then that player can not always go inside, it is as bad as taking a long 3 pointer. Smoove is somewhere in middle.

I gave you the percentages to show contrary to popular opinion, he has actually been making them at a decent rate. In fact other than Lion, he is the highest shooter in the team. Think about that for a moment. His field goal percentage is at 50%.

So since you are not giving examples and saying league average (possibly bundling good and bad shooters together and possible various position players), let me give you some relevant comparisons for you to ponder.

1. Serge Ibaka – at 16-23 feet, he is making 38%
2. Kevin Love – at 16-23 feet, he is making 34%
3. Chris Bosh – at 16-23 feet he is making 35%
4. Amare Stoudemire at 16-23 feet he is making 29%

Josh again is making 40% at that range.

Two players doing better than Smoove at that range are KG and Boozer and that can be expected.

Yes the book on Smoove is let him shoot, but the book has a flaw. If he stays within the flow of the game, and shoots and is making them, he should go ahead and take that shot. The facts support my statements, your position are popular myth and fiction.

by ATLpaul on Jan 22, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

No

here’s the hole in your statement – I am saying that the most inefficient shot as well as the most MISSED shot is from that range. For anyone taking that shot, those numbers are poor. So, I’m not worried about whether or not he’s making that shot and I don’t care if other cats are worse. Why? The reason they are missing at that clip is because it’s NOT a good shot. So, why do I care that you listed players who are missing a shot they shouldn’t be taking either. That’s never been their shots, so all you’ve said is – those four guys shouldn’t be shooting from 16-23 ft either. And I’d make the claim that they probably aren’t shooting that shot as much as Josh and at the wrong times to boot.

So, I’m going to continue to say – I don’t care about inside moves and other stuff. Shawn Marion spent his early career doing what he was good at – garbage buckets, transition, and using his quickness to put up 20 and 10. That’s what Josh should do. On the days where he meets a defender he can’t get past (and really we’re only talking about 2-3 defenders here), then on that day – someone else needs to take up his slack shooting shots THEY can make. Not Josh shooting shots at a poor clip (yes, 40% is poor, not decent) because he can’t get inside. So, the facts support your statement that Josh should take poor shots because he against a few defenders he might not be able to go inside. He shoots 65% at the rim, so for those few defenders – you want me to say..give up going inside to shoot a 40% shot. If you’re not Dirk or even Al for that matter – no, Josh – just stop shooting the shot. You’re not going to convince me and the rest of the basketball watching nation that your logic holds.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 23, 2012 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Again you are talking absolutes

And no PF in the league plays entirely inside. Of-course Smoove is more efficient at the RIM, but him taking a few jumpers a game as long as he controls himself is not hurting him.

Look at his efficiency rating below,

http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Efficiency.jsp

But I am sure you will come back and say you disagree because your observations are against the facts that he is the number 23 most efficient player in the league. So this conversation will not go anywhere, as long as you refuse to value the mountain of data that goes against your arguments.

by ATLpaul on Jan 23, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

So, again

I didn’t say that every PF plays entirely inside, but the ones who can’t make jump shots don’t shoot them. So, I went over to hoopdata.com and made one filter for players getting over 30 mpg and guess what I found. Let’s see – Josh Smith is a top 10 player in the league in makes at the rim at 70%. A list full of Cs and PFs with as many attempts as the top guys have. Move down to 16-23ft shots and where is Josh – he’s at barely above league average in his BEST YEAR shooting and behind 7 other PFs and 35th in the league and shooting it MORE than folks who are money from those positions. Now, if you go back to last year – Josh was about 70th on that list, but was shooting the same percentage as he is now from that range. So, it’s that other players are slumping at a shot they can hit, not that Josh is doing much better than last year to justify the shot. There’s no data that supports your point. Not only that the sample size is too small. I looked up your numbers and Bosh is shooting that shot BETTER than Josh, so should I spend time trying to verify your numbers. No. It’s pointless. Just like using efficiency stats to say – oh, well, it’s not hurting his efficiency relative to the league. I don’t care about that. I care about how much higher it would be if he wasn’t shooting shots he historically can’t make. I’d rather him work on shooting free throws and figuring out how to get to the rim where he’s devastating vs. trying to get better at a shot he’s bad at and is likely to never get better at. All of those things would increase his PER. All you’ve shown me is how much better he can be if he cut out the BS. So, I’m not going to say it’s against the facts. In fact, every fact says Josh Smith is mediocre at best at jump shooting – it’s taken a HOT streak for Josh to be average at it so far this season and you want me to say – no, accept that because he can’t keep himself from shooting it. Well, that’s not happening. Not only that your qualifier of as long as he controls himself is the crux of the issue. I certainly expect him to take a 16fter if the clock is running out, but he actually thinks he’s money from there no matter when he shoots it. That’s the problem. I don’t ever want there to be 5 seconds or more on the clock and Josh to think – let me take the least effective shot in my game. So, yes – you are correct – this conversation hasn’t gone anywhere. I will just repeat – regression to the mean. Wait for it…

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 23, 2012 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Bosh's numbers

Went up in last two games, as this conversation has been going on, while Smoove’s went down. So the data I gave you were snapshots and will change as season moves on. Smoove had 2 bad games, Bosh had two good games. We been talking like three days on this topic!

Well, I will say this, if Smoove plays as he did in the second half of Sixers game, then his jump shot average will come down. If on the other hand, he controls himself, and plays like Cavs even when his jump shot is not going in, he will make it in as a all star.

It is all about control and correct application of jump shots in his case, not complete avoidance of it.

by ATLpaul on Jan 23, 2012 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

It's about Josh Smith

Didn’t have 2 bad games – he had Josh Smith jump shooting games. What you’re depending on to make your point correct is something that isn’t sustainable. So, what happened in two games was – he came back to the pack. Guess what happened tonight – he missed 4 from that distance and missed 3 from inside. He had a good game outside (for him) and a bad game (for him) inside. The question is – if he went inside for 2-3 more scores and takes less outside, then we possibly win a little easier.

And I don’t think that you can use tonight as one of those nights where the defense was so tough that he can’t get inside – he just settled for the outside. Good thing he made some of those shots. Anyway, he doesn’t have control of this, so I’d rather we institute complete avoidance unless under 5 secs. Just like an intervention had to be had to get him off the 3pt line – the same is the case for the long 2s.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 23, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Hard to defend Drew's comments.

As Hawk Sr8Talk put it above, the Hawks got beat because they didn’t make their jumpers. Their defense was actually decent, considering that the 76ers were far less efficient than they had been on average coming into the game. Drew’s obsession with “effort”—or the Hawks’ supposed lack thereof—can’t conceal his inability to match Collins’ halftime adjustments or his team’s larger, structural weaknesses. The Hawks got beaten doing the things they do every night.

by Adam80 on Jan 21, 2012 1:57 PM EST reply actions  

The defense

was not at all decent in the third quarter. First half yes but not even close in the second.

@Kris_Willis
+Kris Willis
facebook.com/krisawillis

by Kris Willis on Jan 21, 2012 4:05 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Jason Collins effect

and you honestly cant tell me that his negative impact was not real in that third quarter

by Jonesy24 on Jan 21, 2012 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

If coach felt they quit, state it.

Carlisle did the same thing last year. Its a matter of the players proving coach wrong

by xavip on Jan 21, 2012 2:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I hope LD apologizes for his language.

I can understand not being happy with a 4-game winning streak. I can understand trying to light a fire under his players. But this was not the way to do it under the circumstances. The Hawks have only had a few really bad games thus far. Otherwise they have been playing really hard for Drew. If Drew wants to motivate his players to play harder, he needs to stand up for them on the court. All season the Hawks have gotten the short end of the stick from the refs.

I totally agree with Smoove’s comments after Drew’s: "Everybody is entitled to their opinion. If he felt that way, that’s his opinion. I just felt we got a little careless with the basketball. In times of adversity, everybody has to stick together. Everybody. Players and everybody, and keep everything positive. The slightest thing can deter a situation or an individual."

So early in the season and with Hawks playing overall good ball, the best way for LD to motivate his players is to stand up for them. The whole world, including the Hawks’ own, are doubting the Hawks. The last thing the players need is for their coach to throw them under the bus, especially when no one believes in this team except for those in the locker room.

It is practically impossible for any player and any team to win every game, every quarter, every minute.

by jdewayneatl on Jan 21, 2012 2:43 PM EST reply actions  

Boo hoo! My widdle feewings are hurt...
“Everybody is entitled to their opinion. If he felt that way, that’s his opinion. I just felt we got a little careless with the basketball. In times of adversity, everybody has to stick together. Everybody. Players and everybody, and keep everything positive. The slightest thing can deter a situation or an individual.”

Stop shooting jumpers, you unaware clown.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 21, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

But here's the thing

LD lets him shoot those shots. If you spent your whole career shooting shots where the coach doesn’t say don’t shoot that shot – it’s not your shot, but rather – do it under the ‘right’ circumstances, then no you aren’t unaware to not shooting jumpers. You just may disagree on when those circumstances are and that’s debatable. I debate my mom about things she thinks are important, so this is the issue. They aren’t addressing the issue head on.

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, but ...

Where were the coaching adjustments? Yes the team withered at the increased defensive intensity and blew a lead just like in Chicago. This time it happened earlier and resulted in a blow out the other way, but essentially the same thing happened in the game. We had a prolonged stretch where we couldn’t hit a jump shot. Yep that same old story. It happened with both the starters and the bench. When the bench was out there we went into iso-TMac mode and it didn’t work. When the starters were out there Joe was negated by Igoudala, so we couldn’t even go iso-Joe. When Josh or Jeff tried to penetrate they lost the ball. When Marvin got close to the hole he got rejected hard (it was disheartening to watch).

We still have the same achilles that if the jump shots aren’t falling we don’t have another way to consistently score or even get shots. We need a play we can call that spreads the defense wide by positioning the shooting threats outside, not so fast Josh, you go down on the block. Give Teague the room to penetrate and react to defensive help. The end result shouldn’t be a open jumper but rather either a shot in the paint or a trip to the line. LD should have called a timeout and told the team that the jump shots we were taking were helping the Sixer run. He should have called a play or two with the express goal of a shot in the line or a trip to the line.

Next area that we were positively abused was the boards. Someone will have to explain LD’s system of minutes some day. Elton Brand with his long arms was devastating us. He was outworking our bigs and getting so many boards. Where’s Ivan? He was getting plenty of PT at home. Several games he was a closer. If you’re getting out worked by a 32 year forward who’s had multiple operations, why not send your hungry, give-no-quarter, forward who worked his way up from the d-league up against him? Why not at least try it as a change of pace? If it doesn’t work right away as coach I pull Ivan aside and say “Are you telling me that old man wants the rebound more than you? If you can’t work harder than him on the boards then you aren’t going to be in this league very long. Go out there and show me you want to be on the court.” Then if Ivan is given it full effort I say to Zaza that’s the type of effort you need to stay on the floor. I know that Brand is longer that mean you have to clamp down the ball, you have to secure the rebounding position. Don’t worry about anything else right now except that the Sixers get no 2nd shots.

I felt Larry Drew watched the team fold under the pressure instead of doing what he could as coach to help them survive the run and win the game. He rightfully questioned the team’s resolve, but I do the same for him as a coach because I didn’t feel he did what he could to stop the onslaught either.

by Evil Dallas on Jan 21, 2012 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

"Elton Brand with his long arms was devastating us."

Guess Drew was scared of his lack of height on help defense. Then when Ivan got minutes in the 1st and got blocked on a putback… I don’t know.

* Hawks trade {Al Horford + protected 2nd rounder} for {Perimeter F Jon Leuer and C Andrew Bogut}

* Jeff Teague * Joe Johnson* Jon Leuer * Josh Smith * Andrew Bogut *

by PointGuardSlim on Jan 21, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

*his referring to Ivan. But this team is lacking too much and at times it seems it was 3 on 5. And if not for bench matchups it woulda been a blowout

Marvin vs Jrue Holiday fail
Collins vs Vucevic/Brand fail

Joe Johnson vs Iguodala – fail
Josh Smith vs Elton Brand/Vucevic – fail

No post up options but our point guard is our best scoring option?

Teague vs Holiday – best matchup but our point guard can’t be our best scoring option

* Hawks trade {Al Horford + protected 2nd rounder} for {Perimeter F Jon Leuer and C Andrew Bogut}

* Jeff Teague * Joe Johnson* Jon Leuer * Josh Smith * Andrew Bogut *

by PointGuardSlim on Jan 21, 2012 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Bit ridicoulous to call your team out

After one bad game after a four game winning streak. I dont want to hear about the team quit, because they didnt in the third quarter, They were LOST, and didnt know where to go with the ball as neither Josh Smith or Joe Johnson had anything.

So instead of trying to change the match-up you play Jason Collins LONGER. Who again, was getting outjumped by Elton Brand and outworked by Vucevic giving a clear mismatch advantage to the sixers on offense all game on Pick and rolls where the Hawks had to switch. ultimately

If the feeling of hoplesness looked familiar thats because it reminded everybody of when Mike F’n Bibby started at PG. Exact same thing thing happened here, it all started with Collins not being able to hedge on the pick and rolls being way to slow to guard them…

by Jonesy24 on Jan 21, 2012 4:27 PM EST reply actions  

I didnt even read this before I posted my rant too

http://www.hoopinionblog.com/2012/01/larry-drew-bandwagon-update-wheels-fall.html

Echoes the same point. Larry Drew throwing his players under the bus, even tho it was HIS FAULT for not making the proper adjustments.

by Jonesy24 on Jan 21, 2012 4:37 PM EST reply actions  

Let's be clear

they probably weren’t winning that game, but i agree – you gotta help your team and I don’t think LD did that. You can’t put the onus on they quit. That’s ridiculous…

Hawk Str8Talk

by Hawk Str8Talk on Jan 21, 2012 5:55 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Atlanta Hawks.

Managers

Zaza_pachulia_small hawksdawgs

Walker_hawks_small Jason Walker

339989_2352026010636_1549728496_32463242_1925189807_o_small Kris Willis

Authors

Str8talk_logo_main_200p_small Hawk Str8Talk

317753_2142423076352_1119450085_31772239_660825236_n_small Nate Butler Jr.

Website_logo_small William Sevidal