HawkStr8Talk's Honesty Corner's 5 Truths: Vol. 9
Truth 3. A Split is Great, but...
Unlike Game 3 of the first round, I thought Game 2 was the key. If we could get that game, the series is over. Of course, the Hawks didn't come out with the 'we want to put the dagger in your chest' mentality and so, now we have a series. Yes, the Hawks have handled their business at the Highlight Factory, but we also have to continue to not be deceived into thinking that our team's mental state is not our best attribute. We can collapse at any time, so when we are competitive - we need to capitalize with a victory.
Every fan who has talked about the postseason Hawks and why we aren't getting any respect and all that. Let me keep it real...I hate to listen to it, but it's DESERVED. Teams that don't play to their strengths, who don't recognize their best players, who don't play their best reserves, who lose to teams at home by 30 points, who don't have a lot of heart and what not... yeah, they must PROVE more than once, maybe twice or thrice that they aren't who we thought they were. There's a difference between potential and hope vs. demonstration and belief. Hawks fans see the potential and hope for the best, but everyone sees what they demonstrate. So, let's end the complaining about respect and wanting something we haven't earned and let's just focus on earning what we deserve. Seeing articles about Joe Johnson, Jamal Crawford, and Jeff Teague makes me happy for the simple reason that they earned them. Their play was the reason someone decided it was worthwhile to write about.
And with that note, that's this week's 5 Truths....agree or disagree if you must, but if it's the Honesty Corner, then it can't be lies. See you in the comments..
49 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Truth 1 is flawed. Plain and simple.
Until Teague gets double teamed in ANY situation, then he might can be considered the best Hawk on the floor. Truth be told I think Chicago treats Teague as an after thought on the offensive end. The Bulls are gameplanning to stop JJ.
by xavip on May 5, 2011 5:51 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I don't understand the hangup on double teams.
Teague is playing well on both ends of the floor and making good decisions, as evidenced by the lack of turnovers. He is the only hawk that I feel has made those good decisions consistently, during the first two games.
Funny
that whenever I say something that speaks to the ills of the Hawks – I’m the bad guy, but then I see your comments that complain about some of the very same things…I’m beginning to think this is personal. Are you a former girlfriend? :)
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree about Al
I have actually thought that most of the season but apparently he can do no wrong in these parts
by frootbooty on May 5, 2011 7:28 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Some truths, some half truths, some just plain wrong
Truth 1, Is Teague our best player? NO. I need to see more. I must admit I am not sure if performance on Rose, are Teague alone, or if ankle injury also has something to do with it. That said, I believe our future and present is Teague. But we need to see him more in action before passing judgement on him as the best Hawk. He has ways to go to being as complete as Joe, or bring as many intangibles as Lion to the table. In time, I may agree with you, not now. Not based on 2 games, and certainly as xavip says, you have to look at attention other Hawks get vs. Teague.
Truth 2, It really pains me to again on this one. Smoove is doing everything wrong it seems. Outside of some defense, he is turning the ball over, an absolute no no in playoff basketball with shots he should not take. If he is not taking his role on this team seriously, then yes it is time. And as for Lion, suffice it to say he is having a tough playoff series. I am not sure why, but perhaps a season of staying outside, has conditioned him also not fight inside. Still, he is a valuable asset, and with a real center, I believe the sky is the limit.
Truth 3, we have the Cows exactly where we want them. Did we want to win game 2. Did we need it? No. The most important games as 3 and 4 in ATL. We are going to win 3 and 4, and put our hobnail boot on their face and break their nose after it.
Truth 5, after this series, the respect thing will be fixed.
Ditto about Truth 1
I wanted Teague to start at the beginning of the season, so I’m not a Teague hater. However, it’s a reason that Teague didn’t score 21 the first game and that is because the Bulls were trying to cover Joe one-on-one like everyone else. In game two they where double-teaming Joe cheating off of everyone else. JT was the only player to take advantage.
I don’t think JT has had a better series than Joe (he shooting 57% from the field and 25 points per game). I think they both are the reason the Hawks are not being blown out the gym.
I hear ya
it’s not a super strong – JT is playing like LeBron and JJ is playing like Josh Smith…it’s really more that I’m valuing defense in the discussion and most people aren’t…and with regard to defense – JT is shutting down Rose AND Korver when he’s on them. That matters greatly to me…
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Here's why it's the truth
1. If you are factoring in defense, which for some reason – Drew and others are missing – then Jeff Teague has been the MVP for the Hawks in Game 1 and Game 2. I didn’t say he was the best player in the same way that Derrick Rose isn’t better than LeBron James. So, I just said in this round – he’s absolutely the best player for our team. That’s no disrespect to Joe’s marvelous game 1 – it’s to say Jeff was as critical to that victory. And no, I’m not crowning him…just talking about the first two games.
2. I’m over Josh. Go back to my blog and see how much I’ve praised him and talked about the sky being the limit. And with another team, it still can be, but if we can get a player or players with less skill, but a much higher basketball IQ – that could be a net positive. I’m ready to consider that. Kinda like Melo on the Nuggets…great skill, no desire to play defense and selfish – when they got rid of him, that team blossomed and have room to grow now in ways they couldn’t with Melo. I’m hoping that we can figure out how to leverage him because I think it’s over for him in Atlanta unless we fire the coach and get a REALLY good, secure coach.
3. I’m not sure we didn’t need Game 2 in a way that we didn’t with the Magic. The Magic were a fragile ecosystem, much like us. I don’t see the Bulls as such. We are going to have to choke the life out of that team to win the series and it doesn’t bode well that we didn’t come out with a killer instinct. The Mavs NEEDED Game 2 – you can’t give a team that is better than you life. I wish the Hawks felt like they needed Game 2. We’ll see how they handle the pressure tonight.
5. Yep, I’m hoping it is and until then, I just want people to stop acting like the Hawks aren’t deservedly digging themselves out of a hole on respect.
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree with truth one...Mostly
He defense on the perimeter has been spectacular and you have to factor that in. Chris webber said, “DRose was licking his chops waiting for Hinrich” and I agree. We are in this series and will win this series because of Teague. DRose had 8 turnovers in game 2 and 11-27 in both games……That is the Teague factor.
Is it just me or
do you only comment after a loss? Or is it just all of your free time comes after the Hawks lose. Write something when we win not that I don’t enjoy reading the losing comments. They may not win a championship but there are 29 teams in that same boat. I just think its wrong to judge a team on its ability to win a championship that’s what makes sports great when the unexpected happens and somehow this flawed mentally weak team does something crazy. The Hawks beat the Magic in 6 but were outscored in the series by 15 points. It doesn’t have to be pretty.
It's not just you
I basically only comment after Hawks wins though so I can’t really get mad though.
Nope
I just have a life. I actually have a weekly schedule for these things, but I wrote twice in the last two weeks and it threw me off, so this was later than expected and I got some time at work to get it done.. any way – here’s the deal..if you think it’s wrong to judge the team from a perspective of winning a title, then my columns aren’t for you. That’s my shtick. It’s what I do and how I think about sports. It’s to win the championship. that’s it. At least that’s it for teams I care about with my heart. So, no – I don’t write only when we lose. And no – I’m not going to care about the other losing teams in a season. You play to win the game…that’s what I focus on when I write. It’s why we have multiple writers and multiple blogs, so that many perspectives are espoused. How the Hawks win the title is mine…
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought about making a fanpost like this, with many of the same points.
Jeff Teague was, arguably, the best player on the floor last night, better even than Derrick Rose. I’m not trying to say anything about true talent level or how sustainable it is, but he was right there (worth noting that Joakim Noah also played a terrific game). But you compare his line to Rose’s, he scored much, much more efficiently, there’s no doubt. And he was defending Rose most of the time, playing a big part in his inefficiency. See here-Derrick Rose and the Bulls’ offense was much better on possessions where Crawford was forced to guard Rose:
http://nba-point-forward.si.com/2011/05/05/hawks-gamble-with-crawford-guarding-rose/?sct=nba_bf1_a3
Sure, Rose isn’t 100%, but I’m not arguing that Teague is better, just that he played better. He scored more efficiently, he didn’t turn the ball over, and he even threw in a couple of blocked shots. This confounds any attempt to defend LD’s treatment of him. His numbers and production in games always looked pretty good, relative to his playing time, so you can only think he doesn’t look good in practices. But then he has a night like this, and if you didn’t think he was capable of being your BEST man on the floor in a playoff game in the second round, you’re still incompetent as a head coach. And keep in mind, he wouldn’t have gotten nearly as much playing time as he DID if the Hawks hadn’t been blown out so many times.
And I gave LD props for Game 1, which I went on record and called his best coached game in his brief coaching career. There are extents to which he can’t solve things-he can’t do anything about Josh Smith. He shouts in time-outs about terrible shot selection, but Josh never improves it. He talks about ball movement, and Josh stands still half the time he touches the ball. But still, he put Crawford on Derrick Rose because he was afraid of Kyle Korver, and needed Teague to check him. The problem is, Korver isn’t a threat with the ball in his hands, just as a catch-and-shoot man, so you might as well defend the man with the ball to keep him from making those passes. It makes no sense to let Crawford sag off 6 feet and let Rose move around as much as he wants while setting up the offense. And while the Hawks were getting utterly killed on the boards due to Josh being too busy complaining, it was time to get him out-Atlanta made the big run to take the lead for good in game 1 with Zaza Pachulia on the floor, but he barely scratched in the second half.
Josh Smith pains me so much. He used to be my favorite Hawk too. I watched him for years, seeing the player he could be, the player he should be, and it’s only in these playoffs that I’ve finally concluded that THAT player just a fairy tale. A nice story, a polite fiction we tell ourselves to justify our frustrations. He will not become that man here, and probably not anywhere else, if he gets traded. He’s not going to mature as a basketball in time to take advantage of the peak of his physical gifts. He’s been the single biggest problem with our offense in the playoffs because nobody has to worry about guarding him while he’s outside of the paint. The defense can completely ignore him while letting him take any jumpshot he wants, and it destroys the Hawks’ ability to space the floor appropriately. He hurts everyone else on offense to play where he requires a man to guard him, making it tougher for everyone else, and when he does get the ball, he’s taking shots that waste possessions.
It’s partly, but certainly not solely, for that reason that Horford has been rushing shots since the playoffs began. The defense can focus more on him, especially the frontcourt players, because Josh is taking himself out of the game offensively. Horford is still rushing his shot when he’s wide open, and he might be feeling the pressure to perform a bit. And especially in this series, I think Noah has taken a personal challenge to frustrate Al in every way possible on the offensive side. Combine that with Al’s need to gain confidence, and it’s been a storm of frustration for those who now see Horford as their favorite player.
You might call me a hater, but I’m actually far from it-I think SO much of how talented and skilled the Hawks are that they’re frustrating me, despite how well they’ve done in these playoffs. Despite all their issues, they still have a good chance to advance. It certainly won’t be easy, but getting back home should help their shooting a bit, and having a game on your home court helps with officiating. A few more favorable whistles-mostly directed at Joakim Noah, and in support of Jeff Teague-could make a difference in itself. The Hawks certainly have it in them to have another really hot shooting night, and that needn’t be the only way that they win games this series, either. I really want to see Jeff Teague with the ball in his hands more-he’s not the best passer or distributor, but he probably represents the greatest danger to the Bulls off the dribble in terms of breaking down the defense.
Now let’s just ride this playoff run out and see where it takes us. It could be our last, best chance to truly make postseason noise.
by Bronn on May 5, 2011 9:41 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Wow too long to read
but i did read the article, and i will note that Jeff Teague has done an above average job guarding Korver off the screens, his long arms and quickness negates Korvers height advantage. The problem is simply Rose on Crawford as that should never happen.
I got ya Bronn
And I read it – can’t argue with anything there…esp. the Josh stuff. I’m just amazed that we’ve had a defensive stopper on our bench for much of the season. I mean this should anger every Hawks fan. I really want MC and every national writer to ask Drew – explain the I’ve always had faith in Jeff Teague, but he’s gonna sit on the bench while your team goes 11-20 the last half of the season thing. Someone has to challenge him to answer that question…I STILL want to know why that has occurred. I STILL want to know why we had to give up half the franchise for Kirk Hinrich. It’s actually upsetting to write.
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions
im livid about it
everytime this season we played a quick point i say “aaahh perfect for some teague time” and every time he doesn’t play. none of my friends really watch the hawks that much. they have no faith. i heard them talking yesterday about teagues play and i just wanted to shake them and say “he’s been here all along!!!! we just haven’t truly TRIED him out!”
by HoopsHighlights&Hope on May 6, 2011 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Ok now i read it
and i will add that this is just who Josh Smith is, You pray you get more good josh than bad. BTW i fully expect him to have one of his best playoff games tomorrow. I think in the 2nd half he recognized and found a way to score for us.
I agree with most of what your saying but...
Things are not all that bad.
That was likely the most one-sided battle that they are gonna get in the front court, and drew made some bad tactical decisions that are easily correctable such as letting Crawford guard Rose, and not playing Zaza enough.
It’s rather greedy to try and win both away games as an underdog. That’s as strong of an effort that you are gonna get from Chicago. Rose will probably have better games, but their frontcourt left everything on the floor last night. They had too because they couldn’t let their team lose two home games, it’s too hard to come back from. It is much wiser to save something for next two games.
Just winning one game gives us homecourt advantage, confidence, and momentum going back to Atlanta, we really don’t need to hear doom and gloom from people that were wrong about this season in the first place.
Wrong about what?
First, I’m not saying they are so bad…if you read the other thing I’ve written – I’m pleasantly surprised by much of what’s happened this postseason. We have to stop reactively thinking that everything written that exposes some of our flaws and issues is somehow gloom and doom. We can win this series, but NOTHING from our regular season would give you the impression that they would do it.
As for greed, you bring your A game when a team is down. The Bulls didn’t play that well that we couldn’t win game 2 and so, let’s not get so cocky not to remember that the Bulls were up 47 points in our own building a few months ago. These guys can win in Atlanta. We haven’t been holding down the Highlight Factory as much as we did under the Woodson regime and we’ve been better on the road, so I’m saying – home court hasn’t been as much of an issue in either direction. So, I’m not arguing that you’re wrong, but having a killer instinct is something that I think we’ll need to win this series.
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the players have to have a talk with him
All the players on the team know how stupid it is for him to be hanging out at the 3-point line. If we had D12 under the rim, it might not be as bad, but we don’t. I blame the players who turn the other cheek and act like that don’t see that stupidity.
If I am a coach, and I see Josh at the 3 pt line and Joe with the ball I immediately double team Joe. I think Josh’s refusal to stay in the paint is hurting Joe’s stats as well as Al’s stats. Al usually hits most of his jumpers before the defender can get to him. Now players can cheat inside knowing that the third best scorer (but worst shooter) is in the worst possible positions.
Tell us something we don't know
for once. Why in the world would anyone want to read this crud NOW, in the middle of a playoff series where things have been going well? Who gives a flip?
funny
I find it interesting that I can say positive things about the Hawks and some critical items (as I always do) and all you worry about is the critical. I’m CNN – some are MSNBC, some are Fox News. It’s ok…I still want the Hawks to win. Are you afraid to read something that says – hey, we could actually be up 2-0 on the Bulls. Is that so bad? More than anything, you can revel in the fact that if we win, I’m never writing a blog again…isn’t that reason enough to cheer? Now, relax…no more crud coming right up..
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm not playing that game
you just don’t like me, but it’s cool – I like you because you read and comment, so it’s all good.
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
because you don't really have anything positive to say. Just a hater I suppose.
I do kinda like you though, at least you aren’t afraid to stir things up. And i do want you to know that I don’t think you should quit blogging if the Hawks win (not that I’m predicting that they will), and I don’t want you too either.
It’s just that you have been spewing the same stale crap for the last few years, and you really need to try to get a fresh perspective. You haven’t put forth any ideas that aren’t directive of stuff you already wrote years ago in a long time.
No one cares if something you wrote 2 years ago is wrong now. You don’t need to be so protective of yourself. Try and spread your wings a bit and get out of your comfort zone once in awhile and you might even surprise yourself.
Also you come off like your trying to martyr yourself whenever you talk about ending your blogging "career", lol
Very unattractive
A martyr?
Wow, you are too deep for me, but it’s cool. You’d think that the fact that started writing LESS – that you’d think I wasn’t writing stale things, but hey…I chalk it up to you don’t like my writing and that’s that. It doesn’t really make what I write untrue. I know my perspective on the Hawks org is not everyone’s cup of tea, but I’m gonna stick with it..unless of course we lose to the Bulls. No martyrdom – just would tell me that complaining about what seemingly looks like a train wreck only to see that wreck in the ECF would say to me…it’s time to find something else to do with my time. And honestly, I’m ok with that…
And for the record, I stand by the fact that not much of what I’ve written has been wrong about this organization. :)
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Good stuff as always
I agree that Lion needs to get it going here, and soon, as in tomorrow night. I’m expecting a big game from him, not only b/c he’s due, but also b/c Noah went off in Game 2. Horf can’t be taking that ish in the Highlight Factory. Back to work, son.
With all the crap flying around Teague the entire year, I think we should just sit back and enjoy knowing we were right on this one. It sucks to think about what might have been if his talent was developed throughout his time year, but it doesn’t do us any good. Furthermore, let’s keep routing that Teague keeps this up so there he’s an unequivocal starter next year.
The rebounds for Josh are just as bad as the outside shooting!
I haven’t heard anyone say this yet, but we got out rebounded by 19!!!!!!!
The person with the most ups in the entire building got 6 rebounds?!?!?! That’s okay when you are playing SF and D12 is under the basket, but not when the SF from the other team get double the rebounds (12) that you get and you are tied with the other team injured shooting guard. Somewhere in the game you gotta say to yourself, “Hey, since my jumper is off tonight, let me just focus on crashing the board. We are getting killed down there. Since I am the only post player on the entire roster (sorry Al), then maybe I can take a few more shots under the basket.”
I think Sund has to be thinking about a trade for him this summer.
Yeah
That’s why Zaza really needed to get some more burn. Josh wasn’t blocking anyone out, and at least two of the rebounds he got were attempts that were uncontested by the Bulls because they essentially fell straight into his hands. It’s the reason we could rebound when Horford was off the floor-he was the only man working hard on the boards.
Sadly, Josh is also making everyone else worse.
Have you all ever noticed that team usually double team Josh in the post? When a player is cheating on Josh in the post, they can no longer double Joe or cheat a player towards Jamal. Therefore increasing their productivity without Josh even attempting a basket.
When Josh stands at the 3 point line, his defender can then sit back towards the rim like a free safety and helps against any dribble penetration. That’s my rationale why the Hawks have to shoot jumps shots all the time. I think the Hawks are trying not to make a big deal out of this to keep his trade value up for this summer.
On truth 4, I totally agree
If Joe was consistently hitting clutch shots at crucial stages of games like he did in game 1, he’d very much be worth the contract (there’s that dirty word again) he was signed to. Part of me wonders if he’s been failing to pass out of double teams during the year because he feels the weight of his contract on his shoulders, and feels he needs to put the ball in the bucket at any cost to live up to it.
Will making it back to the Eastern Conference Semis give Larry Drew another year at the helm?
On a totally different topic, has ther been any update on the status of Hinrich's hamstring?
Will making it back to the Eastern Conference Semis give Larry Drew another year at the helm?
Horford vs Smith
I am getting tired of people trying to lump Al into the “as bad as Josh” discussion because it is complete horse shit. #5 has an absolute HORRIBLE pair of games and everyone is so quick to say “B-b-b-but Al hasn’t done anything either!” It’s pathetic.
In Game 1, Al was a nice 4-7 from the floor with 13 rebounds and 4 assists. He committed ZERO turnovers and the team WON. Revisionist history now is that he played poorly. Completely wrong. Not only did he play well, he actually had a positive effect in a winning effort.
On the opposite side of the crap spectrum, Josh was 3-11 from the floor with 6 rebounds. 4 blocks…two of which went back to the Bulls. Instead of an integral cog in the winning wheel, the win was dragging an anchor shaped like a 5.
Game 2…everyone clamored for Al to assert himself offensively. And he did…he just wasn’t hitting those open jumpers. So, like a true team player, he goes in and gets 14 rebounds and dished 6 assists. His 3-12 from the floor was not good, but considering his jump shot percentage, he was at least open and shooting them as part of the offense. And he was completely hustling and doing everything he could to HELP.
Now to Mr. Smith: after his electric shooting display in game 1, he decided to ride that wave of awesome into a 4-14 shooting night. He was lazy, showed zero effort, and completely disrupted the flow of any semblance of offense. At one point, he literally took 2 dribbles, “crossed-over” his man and shot a fade-away jumper like he was Jeff Malone. At another high point, Josh thought he was fouled going for a defensive rebound. He sat on the floor and whined while the rest of the team went up the court and started the offense. He took EIGHT seconds to get onto my TV screen. The funny thing is that he was complaining to the refs EVEN THOUGH THE HAWKS GOT POSSESSION OF THE BALL. That isn’t just dumb play, it is an absolute slap in the face to your team. But hey…at least he took his headband off to show us all how pissed he was…by committing an awful turnover 4 seconds into the 2nd half.
The fundamental difference is that Al may have had one off night shooting, but nothing he did inherently was putting the team in a backwards motion. In fact, he did a LOT more to actually help the team. When Josh has off nights, everything he does pushes AGAINST the team instead of adapting and trying to chip in where he can. Al might have been in a lower gear in game 2, but Smith was in REVERSE.
So stop with the “Al is sucking” nonsense. It is a “misery loves company” argument. He is averaging 13.5 rebounds and 5 assists over 2 games. Not one person would have been unhappy with those numbers prior to this series. Plain and simple, Al would have to punch a teammate in the face to even be in the same suckage galaxy as Josh Smith
I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl
4-7 is NEVER nice for Horford. Win or lose. For a starter playing 40 something min a night that's troubling to me.
He has no business only attempting that many shots. And true people have bad shooting nights, but the lack of FT attempts by Horford should be a signal to Horford to assert hisself on the offensive end. I won’t commend Al for avg. 13 rebounds because that is what he is supposed to do. And really all the talk concerning Horford is due to Horford not playing to his norm. Now I’m not going to say Horford is playing worse but after watching the Hawks all season are you more surprised at Smoove’s overall play or Horford’s overall play in this post season? Imma say Horford.
Smith is bad beyond words.
So much so that I questioned whether he was point shaving. Was I joking? Yes. Was it a good description of Josh’s awful game? Yes.
Like I said, Al may not be lighting the offense on fire, but he is not doing anything to hurt the team either. He picks up his game in other areas. With Josh, the entire house caves in and sucks down the team with it.
I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl
This is not an easy subject , as it is personal
i love both of those guys.
I say this, if you think at the style of play Lion is doing nowadays, even games he has a good line, he is moving out to get his points. I don’t think he is a center, and this is just one indicator. But even as a PF, you have to score inside, or else, you are really not a power forward in the classic way. So that is what I am getting very concerned with the more this year has gone with Lion’s play, not necessarily the stats or efficiency
Yep - his style of play has taken him outside the paint on offense
You have to ask yourself, though, who is to blame? Clearly, Horford has become more and more reliant on the 18 footers, and he should look at himself for having not yet developed a solid post-game. But with the offense itself being so reliant on jump shots, it’s also possible that Horford has drifted outside in order to get more shots. Let’s not forget: Drew has been designing Horford to curl around screens as if he’s a jump shooter.
It’s not all Horford here. It’s systemic.
it is definitely relative
my point was that – I want Horford to impact the game the way I’d expect an All Star to impact the game. Your argument is that Horford isn’t playing as near as bad as Smith. I’ll say – ok, point taken. Now, back to my point of the fact that Horford is not playing well. That’s all. I’m not lumping their actual worth together. I’m saying their relative worth is borderline suckage for Al and even more outright suckage from Smith. That’s all. xavip and I agree on this point.
Hawk Str8Talk
by Hawk Str8Talk on May 6, 2011 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
To me the only difference between Josh last night, and the average Josh preforemance, was that he got exposed on the defensive end by Noah when they went to him, and he missed most of shots at the rim, again with Noah guarding him.
This seems pretty correctable to me by playing our centers more (Zaza and Collins played a combined 12 minutes in the last game.) and by letting Horford guard Noah, and Josh guard Boozer.
This will leave Boozer open more often but it will make it harder for them to run pick and rolls with Boozer (where he’s most dangerous), and it should help keep Noah off the Boards. Basically Boozer/Josh, and Noah/Horford is a much better match up for us than Boozer/Horford, and Noah/Josh is. It opens Boozer up to score more but is anyone really that afraid of him anyway? Didn’t think so.
There were a bunch of other goofy tactical call like that in game 2, but I think that should be the worst our front court plays all series. And really rebounding was where they really killed us last night, we even had more free throw attempts.

by 



















