Stop Sund before he picks again, please

As the Hawks prep, in at least some scenarios, to draft with the #19 and #49 picks in this year's draft, one question has me deeply worried about Thursday night: We all know Rick Sund is running the Hawks draft, right?

What's the cause for concern, you say? This is the same Rick Sund who built a spunky Mavericks team in the 1980's, and kept the Supersonics hanging around the playoffs back before they were named for the weather in a tiny Midwestern media market.

Yet his drafts of the past decade with the Sonics were the biggest collective dud we've seen this decade — and that's taking into account our dearly departed Billy Knight, Isiah Thomas and Billy King.
And his record indicates we might be in for a doozy come Thursday night.
Let's look at his picks, first and foremost (after the jump):

2001
— 12th pick Vladimir Radmanovic, 40th pick Earl Watson, 42nd pick Bobby Simmons (who became Pedrag Drobjnak)
2002
— 49th pick Peter Fehse
2003
—12th pick Nick Collison, 14th pick Luke Ridnour, 41st pick Willie Green
2004
— 12th pick Robert Swift, 35th pick Andre Emmett, 41st pick David Young
2005
— 25th pick Johan Petro, 48th pick Mickael Gelabale, 55th pick Lawrence Roberts
2006
— 10th pick Saer Sene, 40th pick Denham Brown, 53rd pick Yotam Halperin

Ye gods.
The results are pretty ugly, when you look at who's left in the NBA, much less still playing for the Sonics/Thunder.
Collison, Ridnour, Simmons, Radmanovic and Watson are the only consistent contributors in the league, though none of them would be considered stars by any stretch of the imagination.
Swift, while he'd be first team for the NBA's Awkward White Guys with Lots of Tats squad, isn't much else.
His 3.3 ppg and 13 minutes per game this year weren't even in Zaza Pachulia territory, though he did shoot a career best 52 percent from the field. That should at least make Solomon Jones and Randolph Morris envious.
Swift_medium

 Robert Swift, full of great tattoos and very bad basketball, via thesportsgeeks.com

Swift and Sene would have to be considered the biggests busts, given a relatively high draft placing with absolutely nothing to show for it in the NBA.
Looking over this draft record, you begin to see why that Sonics team built around Ray Allen (and admittedly a good trade on Sund's part, dumping Payton for Allen, but only because George Karl and Ray Allen couldn't stand each other in Milwaukee anymore) always seemed to be stuck in mediocrity hell.
A starting five of those picks alone would be Ridnour/Watson/Collison/Swift/Bobby Simmons. That team might win 12 games.
Sund could never really put the pieces around Allen through the draft to take the next step until his ouster with the new ownership group.
What's particularly troubling about his Seattle drafts is those teams had two gaping holes that needed to be filled: Bruising post players to suck up rebounds and defend, and legitimate wing/backcourt players to complement Allen.
Did Sund find any of those players in any draft? 
Not even close.
After Collison, he failed to draft a serviceable big man, particularly the rebounding/shot blocking center the Sonics needed at the time. Watson is a decent back-up in the league (actually a really nice find at the 40th pick, same with Willie Green at 41, but nothing you would ever build a team around), while Ridnour fills the same role in Milwaukee.
Only he was picked at 14.
Its as if Sund has a giant blind spot for post players, and point guards, particularly those who need to fill large holes for the team, which just happens to be what the Hawks need. And he happens to have a knack for picking precisely the wrong foreign big man at just the wrong time. Vitaly Potapenko as a free agent re-signing after the Vin Baker trade ring any bells?
And its not as if those drafts were full of stiffs.
Rajon Rondo went at #21 in 2006. 
David Lee at #30 in 2005. 
Kevin Martin, Jameer Nelson, Josh Smith, J.R. Smith and Al Jefferson were all on on the board when Sund picked Robert Swift in 2004.
At least Billy Knight stumbled into Josh Smith in the mid-to-late first round, the proverbial broken clock being right twice a day, and found a solid player in Josh Childress. And the jury is still out on Marvin Williams, and he seems to have found a real player in Al Horford.
I can't believe I'm defending Billy Knight, but his draft record looks better than Sund.
Constrained by the cap, this team will largely need to build via the draft from a relatively difficult position in the mid to late first round, barring any trades.
In his defense, Sund has a pretty good track record making deals. The aforementioned Gary Payton for Ray Allen move has been widely lauded, and deservedly so.
But the Hawks look to be in a situation similar to those Sonics teams, with the draft being the primary vehicle for improvement. The team has relatively little room to maneuver in the trade market or sign outside free agents without disrupting what's widely considered the team's core, thanks to a miserly, or cash-strapped, ownership group.
Throw in the weakest draft class in a very long time, and it all seems to be lining up that Thursday night will be a disappointing one for Hawks fans, barring some boffo trade involving some Josh action (either Childress or Smith), picks and a pu-pu platter of other players.
If Sund does pick at #19 or #49, I'm just hoping its not Petro/Sene/Swift all over again.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Peachtree Hoops

You must be a member of Peachtree Hoops to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Peachtree Hoops. You should read them.

Join Peachtree Hoops

You must be a member of Peachtree Hoops to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Peachtree Hoops. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker