One key to the Blazers game I am sure of already
On this young season, the Hawks are coming into the Blazers game 3rd in the league in pace behind only perennial run and gunners Golden State and Phoenix. The Blazers are 27th.
We are so early in the season looking at trends is a bit ridiculous. The Blazers were dead last in 2008-2009 so their numbers are no aberration. They execute and enjoy playings in a very slow, half cout style. However, the Hawks are up almost 12 possessions per 48 minutes. Part of that is playing other faster teams (the Pacers and Lakers are in also in the top ten), part of it is turning it over too much or getting turnovers, and part of it is the Hawks have actually picked up the pace. So yes, it remains ridiculous to categorize the Hawks as a certain style, but I think one of the keys to the game will be the Hawks keeping up the trend they have set so far of playing at a faster pace.
The Hawks have never shown any ability to stop Brandon Roy. Actually, Josh Smith guarding him in the fourth quarter of the first game last year made it abundantly clear they don't even know how to stop him. And with Greg Oden and Joel Przybilla guarding the rim, the offensive and defensive end could be very difficult for the Hawks to invade the paint with any effectiveness. It could quickly move to that bogged down half court game we love so much full of one on one basketball. Unless Atlanta can get Portland's bigs in foul trouble, I could easily see a slow game turn into the Hawks settling for jump shots, and Atlanta is simply not good enough in their offensive sets to get good looks that way enough times down the court.
Really though, beyond speculative mathups, a slowed down pace might work for certain guy on Atlanta, but we know it works for Portland. It is their style. If the Hawks can disrupt that rhythm, it seems only logical. And disrupting rhythm is what you want to do on the road.
The problem is I am not sure the Hawks can run. They have done it sporadically with mixed success over the years. But the key for them is always on the defensive end. They have to make stops and then push the pace. Atlanta is not good enough offensively to simply outscore anyone. And they have just never been a team that seems to be able to combine both elements on a consistent basis. For every Wizards game, there is a Lakers game.
The make up of this team with Mike Bibby and Joe Johnson may not lead to running every game. We may not have the discipline on both ends of the floor to make that the team's go to style of play. But for this game, a game that is not a must win or even an expected win, I would love to see a commitment to setting the tone with a fast pace. If the Hawks want to win on the road, they do not need a specific style of play above another, but they need a commitment to some style every night.
With Portland, it makes sense to clamp down, grab the board, and run your guts out for four quarters. We will see if the Hawks have any interest in either of those things tonight.
Go Hawks!
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
I like our chances at getting Oden in foul trouble...
if we attack the lane. If we are the stand around and wait for the ball to jack a jump shot Hawks, it’ll be tough. But the first two games of the season Hawks would foul out Oden in under 20 minutes.
Oden ANDPrzybilla
Both of our bigs have had problems staying in the game this season.
"Goals are good. Plans are better." -Ben.
if foul trouble happens, great
i just don’t like a strategy that goes at a disadvantage (blazers size) in hope that they mess up. i would rather the hawks run and use their advantage thus not have to worry about the Blazers messing up.
But it's not a hope hd...
it’s exploiting a weakness. Oden and Pryzbilla, while big and great shot blockers as well as strong rebounders, are very foul prone. If Horford can step out and hit his 16-18 footer, if he and Josh can pass the ball on the interior like they were the first two games, if the team can pass and attack the basket as a whole like they did in the first two games, you can take advantage of what is a noted weakness of that team—their Cs avoiding fouls. It gets you to the line, gets their best shot blocker/rebounder off the floor, and can help get them over the foul limit for even more free throws later on in the quarter. Our bigs are quicker, more agile, and can move the ball well when they are focused. That is taking a strength of yours and using it to attack a weakness of your opponent.
Umm
Why exactly should we not expect to win this game? I think we can exploit Oden with a much more athletic and faster Horford and I think we have a better team overall.
Are you still upset about the JJ comments or the Laker loss in general, because you aren’t being your usual peppy self. Stop being a downer man, that’s my gig, haha.
"This is America, if we can’t self-righteously look down on others and blame them for our faults, the commies win."-----Cormican on Bleeding Green Nation w/r/t fans overreacting to the Eagles signing of Michael Vick
Why exactly should we not expect to win this game?
Two words: Rose Garden
The Blazers are very strong at home as evidenced by their 34-7 record at home last season.
As for the Hawks being a better team overall. No way.
I agree with you in that if the Hawks can get Oden and Przybilla into foul trouble they could find a way to win the game. But if Oden isn’t in foul trouble he is a dominating interior defender and Horford will have trouble scoring on him in the post. On the offensive end, if the Blazers guards can get Oden the ball on the move or in easy dunking range, Oden is capable of putting up some points.
Overall it should be a good game but I would put the Blazers on top with a final score of something like 102-97.
Blazersedge mods suck
Hmph
What were you saying again?
"This is America, if we can’t self-righteously look down on others and blame them for our faults, the commies win."-----Cormican on Bleeding Green Nation w/r/t fans overreacting to the Eagles signing of Michael Vick
HA!
We know not to ever listen to you again! Where’s the support??
by Hawks Fan From Day One on Nov 4, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
Because...
The Blazers are probably a better overall team and the Rose Garden is a big boost for the Blazers who play great at home. As stated if Pryz and Oden dominate the glass on both sides and Portland plays some good D it should be a win. Although…….
The Hawks are very good as well and will benefit from a banged up Aldridge and a Portland team still coming to grips with Oden starting, Webster starting, Miller and Blake fighting for minutes and a great defender in Batum out for a few months. If you want to win at the Rose Garden, this is the time of the season to do it…..
"If you want to win at the Rose Garden, this is the time of the season to do it….."
Very true. Just ask the Nuggets. The Blazer’s have not found their identity yet. On court chemistry is not where it needs to be yet.
"Goals are good. Plans are better." -Ben.
To Hawksdawgs
You seem to be one of the consistent contributors to this site. I have read many of your posts and the only thing that I would like to see you do to help us be able to decipher what you are saying better is to utilize your spell check. You cannot fulfill your dream of being a sportswriter with the number of spelling errors, punctuation miscues and whatnot in many of your posts. Just a heads-up.
by Hawks Fan From Day One on Nov 4, 2009 10:51 AM EST reply actions
no desire to be a sportswriter, just a guy with a blog
but i know i am not a grammar/spelling connoisseur and i always correct specific grammar critiques.
this post seems to not have many mistakes. i certainly ended all my sentences with periods.

by 
















