Atlanta Hawks 100, Philadelphia 76ers 86 or efficient, boring basketball that I want to see again and again
Up to the Mike Bibby three pointer with a little over a minute to go, the Hawks had 42 possesions give or take an offensive rebound or two in the second half. They went inside at some point in all but 11 of those possessions. The predominant culprits in the 11 possessions where the ball stayed outside were Jamal Crawford and Joe Johnson. Joe was horribly ineffective when he refused to give the ball up getting fouled once, turning the ball over three times, and missing a jumper once. Luckily, Jamal was hitting his outside shot or getting fouled on this night, and like any night where that happens, Jamal forces you to love him.
These little stats don't tell us much that we do not already know. Shockingly, Jamal and Joe like to shoot and over dribble sometimes. Still, tonight shows how efficient and easily the Hawks can operate with an actual inside out game. There was nothing flashy. No dominant performance. No one shot 90% from the field or scored at will. The Hawks played team basketball and team basketball only requires normal performance.It just takes one and half of the Hawks three main guards to hit jumpers and a willingness to pound the ball inside. Last night was so boring because it was not flashy. The Hawks out executed the Sixers. It might not sell tickets, but it wins games.
Jamal Crawford and Joe Johnson are great one on one players. If Jamal drives the ball, his ability to get to the line makes that style of play an asset to the team. Well spaced and executed isolation plays can be very effective with Joe Johnson. They guy has a knack to weave through most any defense. However, dribbling around without any offensive set is just bad basketball. It is bad basketball when they miss, it is bad when they make. The Hawks were either fouled or made a shot 20 out of 31 times the ball went inside at some point during the possession. The Hawks can play any number of styles. They can run and play half court. They can isolate and pick and roll. They can post up and drive the ball. The Hawks have the players to do all these things, but each of them is made more effective and efficient when the Hawks figure out a way to use more than one guy going down the court.
The Hawks are not a super star led team. The faster they realize they can be a super star team when they play with all five guys the better.
Victory Bullets
- It felt like Dalembert blocked Josh Smith 15 times.
- Why does Josh Smith not beat the defense down the floor every time? It makes the game surprisingly easy for him.
- Jeff Teague actually played defense at the end of the second quarter and Willie Green still made the shot. It was like Teague trying actually helped the shot go in.
- Once again, Teague looks perfectly capable in his short first half stint.
- The way the PA announcer says Thaddeus Young almost made me ok with the fact that he scored so much.
- When Mike Bibby is drilling jumpers, it makes you realize how much better this offense is and in a small way, why Jeff Teague does not get more minutes.
- Joe Smith just put in the quietest 14 minutes you will ever see on a basketball court. I must have blacked out for each of his five rebounds.
- If Marvin is going to continue to be a no show on offense, the least he can do is pull down nine boards.
- Can we stop running plays for Zaza? And I of course say that with the greatest of love and respect.
- Back during the 72 reasons to get excited about the season, one of them was "Mike Bibby's jumper shot." Last night justified its place on the list.
Go Hawks!
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
So much better, Hawks.
It was nice to see the Hawks get back to chopping wood and just put an inferior team away in methodical fashion. I read something recently that pointed out that good teams do not let games against lesser teams come down to one or two possessions, as there is too much chance involved. So I was happy to see the Hawks avoid that and win going away.
Regarding the offense, so correct, Drew…the key with the one-on-one play is to use it to force the defense to double-team. Ideally when that happens there’s a pass to another guy in position to score. Last night the Sixers telecast nicely illustrated a second-half possession where JJ posted up Iguodala and backed him down, then shot an easy little jump hook. On the replay they showed how Bibby was standing at the top of the key and Young had to choose whether to help Iguodala or stay with Bibby; he chose the latter, and the one-on-one worked.
I’m not making a case for or defending one-on-one ball any more than any other offense; obviously ball movement is always a must. I just want to expand my own understanding of offensive strategy, mismatches, spacing, etc., and I think I see how the Hawks want to use their best mismatch players—JJ and JC. And then there is how not to use them, i.e., vs. Orlando.
by rbubp on Nov 28, 2009 11:20 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice post...and win
I’m just glad to get a win after Thursday’s debacle. We’ve played Orlando a number of times before Thursday with most ending in a rout. When Woody says he’s going to breakdown the film and see what went wrong, does that mean he’s just going to literally break the tape in half and throw it in the garbage can? The results indicate that very well may be the case. I truly don’t believe Orlando is THAT much better than we are. Just like I didn’t think OKC is THAT much better than Orlando when they blew them out a few weeks ago. Nice to see Bibby stroking it like a old pro. Also nice to see Smoove not getting frustrated with the barrage of blocked shot by Dalembert. If JJ was sulking, I’m not even worried. We still got the job done…REGARDLESS!! That in itself should let Woody know that JJ is not above a 1/2 quarter benching unrelated to foul trouble. He seemed aloof the entire night. I’m so over that. Go Hawks!!
by dstdeelite on Nov 28, 2009 2:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
it was a nice win
Although jj was a no show but this game showed me that’s why we got jamal. someone who can pick up the slack. not that BIBBY didn’t of course but jamal made up for jjs alter ego which is josh No.2
by Hawksgirl on Nov 28, 2009 3:38 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
So many times on NBA Live, this line seemed true...
“It was like … trying actually helped the shot go in.”
by Mr. Sanchez on Nov 28, 2009 4:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Shots going in the net, makes any offence look good
And that’s the difference I think from last night and the night before. Against Olando in the second half. The Hawks could’nt throw a egg in the frying pan from the side of the stove. They had open uncontested shots that just would’nt fall. Last night was really more of the same, but this time the nets went SWISSSH.
I like boring too when we win, and highlights are forgetable when we lose. But I tell you what, Woody will be a lock for coach of the year if he manages the time outs to keep the Hawks from beating themselves.
" MR.24 "
by ctu24 on Nov 28, 2009 10:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 














