Jeff Teague, flashes of potential wrapped in a workman's effort.
There is maybe one rookie each year that makes a legitimate impact on a team. Doing something an average veteran role player could not do. And any time you can make a list affirming something basketball related and LeBron does not make it then you know it is a short list (it might be this and winning championships). A rookie playing a vital part of a playoff team is just rare. Derrick Rose last year, Al Horford the year before, but more than just good performances, those guys found good situations. Rookies can come in and score points and make contributions, but what is clear is that neither the lottery placement nor college success or even outrageous athleticism will make you an impact player. For most NBA rookies, the only way to become that kind of player is time.
No one can expect Jeff Teague to come in and be an impact guy. If the Hawks are counting on Teague as any kind of focal point for season long team goals, then something has gone horribly wrong. Yet just from the simple acknowledgment that Teague is incredibly fast, can jump incredibly high, and has some semblence of a jumper (as Josh Childressy as it looks), there is something to be exciting about. You watch youtube clips and hear player quotes and the juices flow a little naturally. But the dude is a rookie, and he is a rookie that fell to 19th overall for a reason. The Hawks may have lucked out and picked a future starter in this league, but they may have gotten a guy who is indifferent on defense and turnover prone. We don't know, and we probably won't know by the end of this season.
I have really high hopes for Jeff. With the obvious prerequisite of hard work, I think he could be borderline special. He has all the natural tools you could need. But this year? This year I would take flashes of that future alongside the ability to play minutes and get experience without being a huge detriment to the team. We all want Woodson to begin developing him. Teague needs to hold up his end of the bargain, and that is going to take workman's effort. It means focused defense, knowing the offensive sets, and creating and taking high percentage shots. If Teague can keep his aggressiveness and confidence in that kind of bundle, we will not only be able to mark Jeff Teague's first year down as a success, we will have a better team.
Other player previews: Marvin Williams, Zaza Pachulia, Mo Evans, Mike Bibby, Jamal Crawford
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
Caution
I like the pick too, but I’m reluctant to get my hopes up too high for him. He could be a beast sometimes at WF, especially in those high profile ones against Duke and UNC, but I saw that loss to Cleveland State coming and picked WF to lose that one. Duke had like 5 steals off him in the second game last season. He needs to work on long season stamina and decision making.
Maybe I’m just still cautious ever since Brian Zoubek scored like 27 points in his first exhibition game at Duke as a freshmen. And weren’t we hyping up Acie Law a lot too last year?
this has me a bit scared. not watching a ton of college hoops (colgate doesn’t make national tv much), i was crazy excited about acie from the times i saw him in the ncaa tourney.
the couple times i caught teague last year, he was amazing.
there is potential here, but what is the best case scenario? is he a ben gordon type? maybe jason terry? god shamgodd?
Monta Ellis
I think his game is similar to Monta Ellis.
I'll take another Jet...
he was on some horrible teams here, but he was the only decent option on most of those teams. Jason Terry is an underrated player imo.
i was excited for acie
not sure if it was because of the pgs we had at that time or the fact that i thought his game would translate fairly easy.
two things i underestimated were his relative lack of any upside and how focused every possession was around him in college.
but i agree. you have to be real cautious in your optimism when it is based around potential that has already shown cracks.
just watched the nba.com practice...
The funniest thing I saw is that the coach’s office is small small that some coaches have to be out in the hallway during a meeting!!! At least we know our money goes to the players and not coaching luxury
by marvin's ladies of the night on Oct 8, 2009 7:39 PM EDT reply actions
Most interesting observation from last night....
We played our best and played at the best pace in my opinion with this line up:
1-bibby
2-teague
3-Joe
4-Smoove
5-Al
If Al and Josh can work their butts off on the boards, this is a VERY dangerous lineup
by marvin's ladies of the night on Oct 8, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions
IIRC, Bret over at Hoopinion linked to an article from Sekou where Woodson mentioned (or alluded) to running a three-guard lineup a lot this year, though I think it meant with Crawford in over Teague. Essentially, this bumps Marvin to the bench which I’m not sure I agree with just yet. I think I’ll hold judgement until I’ve at least seen it in action a few times, but my intial impressions is that it might work against smaller lineups.
"This is America, if we can’t self-righteously look down on others and blame them for our faults, the commies win."-----Cormican on Bleeding Green Nation w/r/t fans overreacting to the Eagles signing of Michael Vick
I prefer Teague...
maybe over Bibby, maybe over Crawford, but I like sliding Joe to SF some and letting Marvin, Josh, and Al share the 4/5. But I also like it with Teague involved too if it’s not bad defensively. His speed just adds a level, which alonside those big men running the floor can be very advantageous.

by 















